본문바로가기 푸터바로가기

한국농촌경제연구원 로고

  1. ENG
  3. 사이트맵 열기

    한국농촌경제연구원 로고

    ENG
    사이트맵 끄기
  4. 메뉴열기
메인으로 이동

농촌경제

이전소득의 빈곤 및 소득불평등 완화 효과 비교분석 : 일반 가구와 농림업 가구를 중심으로

2011.04.01 7643
연구보고서 표지
  • 저자
    강성호, 최옥금
  • 등록일
    2011.04.01
원문보기
목차

1. 서 론
2. 선행연구 검토 및 연구방법
3. 분석 결과
4. 요약 및 결론

요약문

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of transfer income system in Korea, in terms of income inequality and poverty reduction effects. Using ‘Family income and expenditure survey’, ‘Farm household economy survey’, and ‘Forestry household Economy Survey’, this study estimates poverty ratio and Gini-coefficients as the main indicators of the effectiveness.
Main findings of the research are as follows: first, poverty ratio of farm household and forestry household is higher than general household's poverty ratio. Secondly, the poverty reduction effects of public transfer programs are the highest in farm household, forestry household, and general household. And commonly, as age is getting higher, the poverty reduction effects of public transfer programs are higher. And the poverty reduction effects of private transfer are higher than public transfer programs in only general household. These results suggest that the poverty reduction effects of public transfer programs will be higher if we include farm and forestry household. And based on these results, it is needed to supplement elder's income support system for farm and forestry household.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of transfer income system in Korea, in terms of income inequality and poverty reduction effects. Using ‘Family income and expenditure survey’, ‘Farm household economy survey’, and ‘Forestry household Economy Survey’, this study estimates poverty ratio and Gini-coefficients as the main indicators of the effectiveness.
Main findings of the research are as follows: first, poverty ratio of farm household and forestry household is higher than general household's poverty ratio. Secondly, the poverty reduction effects of public transfer programs are the highest in farm household, forestry household, and general household. And commonly, as age is getting higher, the poverty reduction effects of public transfer programs are higher. And the poverty reduction effects of private transfer are higher than public transfer programs in only general household. These results suggest that the poverty reduction effects of public transfer programs will be higher if we include farm and forestry household. And based on these results, it is needed to supplement elder's income support system for farm and forestry household.

저자정보
강성호Kang, Sungho
저자의 다른 보고서
저자에게 문의
강성호Kang, Sungho
저자에게 문의

※ 퇴사하신 분이지만 아래의 내용을 입력해 주시면 관리자가 전달해 드리겠습니다.

구매안내

KREI의 출판물은 판매 대행사 (정부간행물판매센터)와 아래 서점에서 구입 하실 수 있습니다.

판매대행사
(주)정부간행물판매센터 http://www.gpcbooks.co.kr
서울특별시 중구태평로 1가 25번지
TEL02)394-0337, 734-6818 FAX 02) 394-0339
판매서점
농촌경제연구원 cctv 설치현황
교보문고 http://www.kyobobook.co.kr
영풍문고 http://www.ypbooks.co.kr
알라딘 http://www.aladin.co.kr
  • 상세정보 조회
    7643
  • 다운로드
    22

같은 분야 보고서

같은 분야 보고서가 없습니다.

목록으로
다음글
NATURAL EXPERIMENTS ON THE RAW-MILK PRICES FOR DISCLOSING MARKET POWER
이전글
지하수 보전가치 추정에 관한 연구