본문바로가기 푸터바로가기

한국농촌경제연구원 로고

  1. ENG
  2. 사이트맵 열기
  3. 메뉴열기

농촌경제

MULTIFUNCTIONAL AGRICULTURE, PROTECTIONISM,AND PROSPECT OF TRADE LIBERALIZATION

2010.07.01 15719
연구보고서 표지
  • 저자
    문완기
  • 등록일
    2010.07.01
목차

1. Introduction
2. Agricultural Protectionism
3. Understanding Multifunctional Agriculture
4. Forces Impacting Agricultural Trade Liberalization
5. Conclusions: Where Are We Headed?

요약문

The concept of multifunctional agriculture has been suspected of 'disguised' or 'veiled' protectionism by proponents of market-oriented reforms since the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture(URAA). In this article, I review the history and nature of agricultural protectionism and probe the concept of multifunctional agriculture from economics and broader social science perspectives. Then, I contend that agricultural protectionism in the second half of the 20th century was, in fact, a revelation of the demand for the multifunctional roles of agriculture, heightened by industrial policies designed by developed countries to secure the survival and growth of agriculture to a socially acceptable point. An implication of this contention is that we are not likely to have a trading system in agriculture as liberalized as manufacturing/industrial sectors. The frame of debate for agricultural trade is neither protectionism vs. trade liberalization nor market vs. government any longer. I propose that the relevant frame should be centered around the question of how to fine-tune government interventions and the WTO’s trade rules to better serve agriculture-related goals unique to each country across the world. The traffic light box system from the Uruguay Round signified a starting point of promising mechanism that could harmonize market rules with the social demand for
multifunctional and sustainable agriculture. The negotiators in the WTO multilateral talks should discard the perception that it is always a virtue to liberalize agricultural trade.

The concept of multifunctional agriculture has been suspected of 'disguised' or 'veiled' protectionism by proponents of market-oriented reforms since the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture(URAA). In this article, I review the history and nature of agricultural protectionism and probe the concept of multifunctional agriculture from economics and broader social science perspectives. Then, I contend that agricultural protectionism in the second half of the 20th century was, in fact, a revelation of the demand for the multifunctional roles of agriculture, heightened by industrial policies designed by developed countries to secure the survival and growth of agriculture to a socially acceptable point. An implication of this contention is that we are not likely to have a trading system in agriculture as liberalized as manufacturing/industrial sectors. The frame of debate for agricultural trade is neither protectionism vs. trade liberalization nor market vs. government any longer. I propose that the relevant frame should be centered around the question of how to fine-tune government interventions and the WTO’s trade rules to better serve agriculture-related goals unique to each country across the world. The traffic light box system from the Uruguay Round signified a starting point of promising mechanism that could harmonize market rules with the social demand for
multifunctional and sustainable agriculture. The negotiators in the WTO multilateral talks should discard the perception that it is always a virtue to liberalize agricultural trade.

저자정보
문완기Moon, Wanki
저자의 다른 보고서
저자에게 문의
문완기Moon, Wanki
저자에게 문의

※ 퇴사하신 분이지만 아래의 내용을 입력해 주시면 관리자가 전달해 드리겠습니다.

구매안내

KREI의 출판물은 판매 대행사 (정부간행물판매센터)와 아래 서점에서 구입 하실 수 있습니다.

판매대행사
(주)정부간행물판매센터 http://www.gpcbooks.co.kr
서울특별시 중구태평로 1가 25번지
TEL02)394-0337, 734-6818 FAX 02) 394-0339
판매서점
농촌경제연구원 cctv 설치현황
교보문고 http://www.kyobobook.co.kr
영풍문고 http://www.ypbooks.co.kr
알라딘 http://www.aladin.co.kr
  • 상세정보 조회
    15719
  • 다운로드
    4

같은 분야 보고서

다음글
ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF THE LAW OF CATTLE AND BEEF TRACEABILITY IN MARKETING CHANNELS ON THE DOMESTIC HANWOO BEEF INDUSTRY
이전글
MEASURING AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE INDICATORS FOR POLICY APPLICATIONS