바로가기 목록

학술지(농촌경제)

제4유형
  • 영세민 식품보조제도 도입방안 연구
  • 보고서 이미지 없음

    저자
    김성용 , 김철민; 이계임; 최지현; 문현경
    등록일
    2003.07.01

    ※ 원문보기 클릭 시 에러가 나는 경우 조치 방법 : "고객센터 - 자주하는 질문" 참조

  • 목차


    • 차 례
      제1장 서 론
      1. 연구배경
      2. 연구목적
      3. 연구내용 및 범위
      4. 연구방법
      제2장 미국 푸드스탬프제도의 운영과 효과
      1. 운영현황
      2. 전자지불시스템의 도입과 운영효과
      3. 미국 푸드스탬프제도의
      시행효과
      4. 시사점
      제3장 영세민의 식생활 실태 분석
      1. 선행연구 검토와 분석 절차
      2. 영세민의 식품소비구조 분석
      3. 영세민의 식생활
      실태 조사 분석
      4. 영세민의 영양섭취 상태 분석
      5. 시사점
      제4장 식품보조제도 도입의 효과 분석
      1. 분석방법
      2. 가구유형별 식품비 산정
      3. 보조 급여액의 산정
      4. 식품비
      보조의 효과 분석
      제5장 식품보조제도 도입의 방향과 과제
      1. 도입방향
      2. 도입시 주요과제
      제6장 요약 및 결론
      1. 요약
      2. 결론 및 향후 과제
      참고문헌
      부 록

    • NGO`s activities can be legitimate because they are based on social
      phenomena and because NGOs play an important role in responding to social
      dysfunction. Also, the appearance of the concept of global governance shows the
      importance of NGO`s activities and the necessity of their participation in the
      policy process.
      The purposes of this study are to analyze how NGOs participate in the
      agricultural policy process and to depict what the desirable ways of their
      policy participation are.
      Research methods for this study are as follows: first, in order to
      analyze the real situations of policy participation of agriculture-related NGOs,
      we analyzed twenty eight agriculture-related NGOs based on the data collected by
      questionnaire and interviews and compared them with data gained by analyzing
      fifty eight general NGOs located in Seoul; second, in order to evaluate the
      participation of agriculture-related NGOs in the policy process, we conducted
      questionnaire from interviewing NGOs` staffs and public officials and compared
      two groups.
      It is proved that the objective conditions of NGOs are not related to
      the positiveness or spontaneity of their activities. The positiveness and
      spontaneity of their activities are not closely related to the objective
      conditions, but to their intrinsic goals and characteristics.
      The necessity of NGOs` participation in the policy process is
      recognized by NGOs and policy authorities. NGO`s participation can make policy
      makers agricultural policies based on real fields and establish cooperation
      relationship between two groups. Also, they have common opinion about NGO`s
      participation in setting up the fundamental plan like mid- and long-term
      agricultural and rural development plans. On the other hand, there are
      differences in the disadvantages of NGO`s participation and the obstacles on the
      activation of NGO`s participation.
      There were considerable changes in the ways and modes of NGO`s
      participation. The modes and ways of participation have been diversified such as
      movement shifts from illegal riots to legal and formal participation of being a
      partner of formal committees and commissions. However, in general, the
      participation is still more formal. NGOs think that government policies have not
      reflected the voices of actual fields. Because government authority thinks that
      NGOs have stated their interest rather than the interests of the agricultural
      sector as a whole, they could not help having limitations in responding to
      related NGOs` voices. That is, public officials understand these phenomena as a
      sort of Nimby. In order to solve these problems, NGOs` participation
      should be directed to setting up their substantial participation.
      It is very meaningful for government authorities to carry out
      cooperative projects with NGOs. Korean agriculture is not competitive as a
      whole. Only a few items have competitiveness. Rebuilding agricultural
      vitality depends upon the change of paradigm based on the new recognition of
      agriculture and rural areas such as multi-functionality. The basic premise
      in building a new paradigm is that the protection of agriculture and government
      subsidy should be based on general people's consensus. NGOs are the most
      desirable organizations that try to pursue their goals without their own
      interests according to the principles of social justice and public interest in
      order to gain people's consensus. Some projects that need public relations
      carried out by NGOs having integrity may be better than by government
      agencies.
      In this aspect, existing policy response of policy authority may not be
      active. Although government authorities formalize NGO`s participation
      according to timely needs, their positive will has been positive in establishing
      a new paradigm for policy participation. They do not recognize the necessity and
      value of NGO`s participation in the policy process in terms of the protection of
      agriculture based on the persuasion of people.
      The desirable way of civilian policy participation is that agricultural
      policy authority should recognize NGOs as policy partners and carry out
      agricultural projects substantially. The way of cooperation between NGOs and
      policy authorities should be different from issues and make sure the roles
      of NGOs and policy authority. Especially, NGOs carry out projects that need the
      consensus of people and public relations.
      There are some improvements in relationship between NGOs and policy
      authorities. First, mutual understanding between them should be expanded. Both
      sides should expand relationships and put lots of efforts to understand
      each other. Also, existing relationship of the provision of supports and the
      reception of benefits should be changed to the relationship of mutual
      cooperation. Second, the way of policy participation of NGOs should be
      diversified and substantialized such as participating committees having
      decision-making authority and the delegation of agricultural policy
      implementation. The objects of privatization of agricultural policy areas are
      education for consumers and general public and commercialized fields enabling to
      run projects without government supports. For example, the involved are the
      education for environmentally friendly agriculture and retuning to the farming,
      green tourism and rural amenity, consulting farming, and so on.
      Foreign cases shed some lights on reforming the mode of policy
      participation of NGOs. French Agricultural Lead Committee can be adopted.
      However, institutional improvement needs other previous conditions like
      government organizational reform.

    요약문

    저자정보

    이미지가 없습니다

    저자소개
    김성용 (Kim, Sungyong)

    저자에게 문의

    이미지가 없습니다

    저자소개
    김성용 (Kim, Sungyong)
    저자에게 문의

    보고서 이미지

    ※ 퇴사하신 분이지만 아래의 내용을 입력해 주시면 관리자가 전달해드리겠습니다.

    게시물 작성 입력폼

    구매안내

    KREI의 출판물은 판매 대행사 (정부간행물판매센터)와 아래 서점에서 구입 하실 수 있습니다.

    판매대행사
    (주)정부간행물판매센터http://www.gpcbooks.co.kr사이트 바로가기
    서울특별시 중구태평로 1가 25번지
    TEL 02) 394-0337, 734-6818
    FAX 02) 394-0339
    판매서점
    판매서점
    교보문고 http://www.kyobobook.co.kr/
    영풍문고 http://www.ypbooks.co.kr/
    알라딘 http://www.aladin.co.kr/


    활용도 정보
    활용도 정보
    상세정보 조회 좋아요 다운로드 스크랩 SNS공유
    23029 0 10 0 0
    • 같은 분야 보고서가 없습니다.
    • 같은 분야 인기 보고서가 없습니다.
    의견남기기

맨위로